Well, not too bad:

  sscanf(data, "%*" + pos + "s...", ...);

It's not impossible to think of an optimization that uses that format
when the programmer writes

  sscanf(data[pos..], "...", ...);

as long as the sscanf() return value is adjusted. Maybe Grubba fixed
that already?
              • ... Peter Bortas
        • Re: Supp... Martin Stjernholm, Roxen IS @ Pike developers forum
          • Re: ... Stephen R. van den Berg
            • ... Martin Stjernholm, Roxen IS @ Pike developers forum
              • ... Jonas Walld�n @ Pike developers forum
              • ... Martin Stjernholm, Roxen IS @ Pike developers forum
              • ... Stephen R. van den Berg
              • ... Mirar @ Pike developers forum
              • ... Jonas Walld�n @ Pike developers forum
              • ... Mirar @ Pike developers forum
              • ... Jonas Walld�n @ Pike developers forum
  • Support for array(str... Martin Stjernholm, Roxen IS @ Pike developers forum

Reply via email to