>%c can take a + modifier in sscanf but not sprintf. There doesn't appear 
>to be a way to force unsigned encoding using sprintf, it just 
>automatically happens when there's a negative number presented. My concern 
>about this is that the operation isn't symmetric when used with sscanf.

I agree that the behaviour for the + modifier in the sprintf case is a
bit confusing.

Note that there's no such thing as unsigned encoding when it comes to
fix-sized binary numbers.

>Am I wrong in saying that the fact that %-F doesn't work is a bug?

No, I agree that %-F ought to work.
    • ... Bill Welliver
      • ... Marcus Comstedt (ACROSS) (Hail Ilpalazzo!) @ Pike (-) developers forum
        • ... Bill Welliver
          • ... Mirar @ Pike developers forum
            • ... Bill Welliver
              • ... Mirar @ Pike developers forum
              • ... Marcus Comstedt (ACROSS) (Hail Ilpalazzo!) @ Pike (-) developers forum
              • ... Marcus Comstedt (ACROSS) (Hail Ilpalazzo!) @ Pike (-) developers forum
      • ... Mirar @ Pike developers forum
        • ... Bill Welliver
          • ... Henrik Grubbstr�m (Lysator) @ Pike (-) developers forum
            • ... Bill Welliver
              • ... Marcus Comstedt (ACROSS) (Hail Ilpalazzo!) @ Pike (-) developers forum
              • ... Mirar @ Pike developers forum
              • ... Marcus Comstedt (ACROSS) (Hail Ilpalazzo!) @ Pike (-) developers forum
  • Re:... Mirar @ Pike developers forum

Reply via email to