Bill Welliver wrote:
>You can get a full linux OS to run on ARM System-on-chip boards,
>including Pike. The catch is that they're not really embedded systems
>as much as single board computers.

Those are still too large/expensive (for the applications I have in mind).

>I've considered what would be required to strip away the OS, and the
>answer is that you lose a lot of what you'd want to use Pike for
>anyhow: no filesystem, no threads, no built-in networking. Basically,
>C but without memory management and with better types. But really,
>most true MCUs are so space constrained that I'm not sure it's worth
>the effort (which I suppose perhaps depends on the goal).

Well, the hardware the micropython targets should be able to support
an embedded Pike too.
The benefits (obviously) are somewhat faster development, which is
a plus in an embedded system, because debugging is more complicated
on such a system.
-- 
Stephen.
  • Emb... Stephen R. van den Berg
    • ... Stephen R. van den Berg
    • ... Bill Welliver
      • ... Stephen R. van den Berg
        • ... Stephen R. van den Berg
          • ... Bill Welliver
            • ... Stephen R. van den Berg
              • ... Bill Welliver
                • ... Stephen R. van den Berg
                • ... Marcus Comstedt (ACROSS) (Hail Ilpalazzo!) @ Pike (-) developers forum
                • ... Stephen R. van den Berg
                • ... Marcus Comstedt (ACROSS) (Hail Ilpalazzo!) @ Pike (-) developers forum
                • ... Arne Goedeke
                • ... Stephen R. van den Berg

Reply via email to