Hi Andrew, Thank you for the kind comments. There will be more forums (or fora, for purists).
To tell the truth, I'm looking forward to seeing the answer to your questions on which paper to use. I still have a box or two of Ilford Multigrade III RC matt, which was single-weight with no markings on the back. Ilford discontinued making matt RC when they brought out Multigrade IV. A loss for pinholers. RC paper has the advantage of not curling. Also, I've read that the fiber texture in the paper can affect the print. Tom ----- Original Message ----- From: "Andrew Amundsen" <a...@tcinternet.net> To: <pinhole-discussion@p at ???????> Sent: Tuesday, November 05, 2002 1:16 PM Subject: [pinhole-discussion] Paper negative questions > Hi everyone, I am freshly inspired after this weekends pinhole forum, hosted > by Tom Miller and Bill Erikson, at the pARTs gallery in Minneapolis. Very > nice job, hope to see more like it. > > I'm interested in trying paper negative work with pinhole. So I have a > couple quick questions for those with paper negative experience: > > 1) What brand of single weight photo paper has NO labeling on it's back? > > 2) Does the Kodak name, from the back, show through on the final print when > you print with that brand? or is it faint enough not to? > > 3) Which is best to use RC or fiber? > > 4) Any good starting exposures for brands of paper you might be familiar > with? > > Well that will give me a good start, thanks for any help you can pass on! > > Sincerly, Andrew Amundsen > > _______________________________________________ > Post to the list as PLAIN TEXT only - no HTML > Pinhole-Discussion mailing list > Pinhole-Discussion@p at ??????? > unsubscribe or change your account at > http://www.???????/discussion/ >
