Hi to all, >>There is nothing wrong with a separate docs-source/ part in your >>repository that is used for source images, and only including the >>generated images in your src tree of your release. I agree, and it's useful to keep them in Subversion.
> We actually use the PNGs generated from the .graffle files on the Wiki - they > aren't even used by the source code. So I think this argues pretty strongly > for keeping the .graffle files out of the distribution. I agree with you, at least who needs original files for this could get them from Subversion. As said before the only complaint i have on this is that without the same application (Graffle) isn't possible to make some experiments with graphics (ok, using the generated images) ... but it's not a problem. Maybe for the Skin 2.0 we could think on have some preliminary tests in a more general file format (like Illustrator, or Svg, or PhotoShop), importable by many other products (free and not). And the same for Color Palettes. For Graphics Resources etc usually I work in the same way, and it's good. Bye, Sandro
