+1 (in favor of a vote :) )

On Fri, Jun 5, 2009 at 9:44 AM, Greg Brown <[email protected]> wrote:

> I know we have already voted on this once, but I think it is appropriate to
> raise this issue again given our recent discussion of package names and
> adherence to convention. I would be in favor of a re-vote on this issue and
> would be likely to advocate embedding version numbers in JAR file names at
> this point. If no one has any significant objections, I will put this to a
> vote.
>
>
>

Reply via email to