I agree. 2009/6/5 Greg Brown <[email protected]>
> Right. Also, we already voted on this once and came to an agreement - I > didn't want anyone to be suprised that we were suddenly revisiting it with a > new vote, so I started a discussion thread first. > > So, let's see if we can get consensus on this. I am in favor of version > numbers in the file names, and apparently so is Todd. What do others think? > If we agree, I'd suggest that we make this change in conjunction with the > package name change and adding src/doc JARs to the binary distribution, and > do so in the near future. > > > > On Jun 5, 2009, at 12:35 PM, Todd Volkert wrote: > > This topic was highly contentious last time around, which is probably why >> Greg was thinking of a vote. But then again, perhaps opinions have >> changed. I was probably the biggest proponent of versioned jars in the >> past, and my opinion hasn't changed. >> >> -T >> >> On Fri, Jun 5, 2009 at 12:31 PM, Martijn Dashorst < >> [email protected]> wrote: >> >> Just to be clear: when there consensus has been achieved, there's no >>> need for an official vote, unless it is something legally binding such >>> as new committer, pmc member or release. >>> >>> Martijn >>> >>> On Fri, Jun 5, 2009 at 6:29 PM, Todd Volkert<[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> +1 (in favor of a vote :) ) >>>> >>>> On Fri, Jun 5, 2009 at 9:44 AM, Greg Brown <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>> I know we have already voted on this once, but I think it is >>>>> appropriate >>>>> >>>> to >>> >>>> raise this issue again given our recent discussion of package names and >>>>> adherence to convention. I would be in favor of a re-vote on this issue >>>>> >>>> and >>> >>>> would be likely to advocate embedding version numbers in JAR file names >>>>> >>>> at >>> >>>> this point. If no one has any significant objections, I will put this to >>>>> >>>> a >>> >>>> vote. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Become a Wicket expert, learn from the best: http://wicketinaction.com >>> Apache Wicket 1.3.5 is released >>> Get it now: http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.cgi/wicket/1.3. >>> >>> >
