That's news to me. Last time I looked into it, JavaFX was not
supported in the browser on Mac OS X.
On Jun 17, 2009, at 3:19 PM, Philippe Lhoste wrote:
On 17/06/2009 14:27, Greg Brown wrote:
We know. It's unfortunate, but I think it is the right choice for
the long term. FWIW, JavaFX faces the same issue - it requires Java
6 in the browser.
Not really. From the FAQ: "JavaFX applications can run on any
Windows or Mac OS X desktop running Java 1.5 or higher."
JavaFX runtime is shipped with a rt15.jar, which is the rt.jar from
Java 1.5, precisely for wide compatibility reasons. Making some
developers to grunt because they want to use the 1.6 API...
Now, JavaFX probably runs better on latest Java...
--
Philippe Lhoste
-- (near) Paris -- France
-- http://Phi.Lho.free.fr
-- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --
