>I agree, but are you thinking to use Batik from the SVGSerializer, or >do all the work in our code ? >Reading well an SVG file could be complex (it's a complex format), but >maybe only a subset could be more simple, for example SVG Tiny.
Right. I think it would be preferable to avoid any external dependencies, if possible. >And, from what I know, SVG hasn't the definition for some of our GUI >components, so this is only for the graphics part (drawings, etc, for >WTKD files) ? Correct.
