Just a quick note: as long as you don't release to the general public (i.e. users@) you don't have to formally vote on artifacts. This only holds for things that are kept on dev@ or the occasional users seeing if a bug has been fixed.
Martijn On Sun, Dec 20, 2009 at 3:23 PM, Greg Brown <[email protected]> wrote: > Why don't we just call for a vote? That way we don't have to go through the > vetting process twice. > > I actually already did a full review of the artifacts and am ready to vote +1 > when the vote is called. > > > On Dec 20, 2009, at 3:44 AM, Todd Volkert wrote: > >> Tags are cheap, so I actually went ahead and created the RC1 tag. I'll call >> for a vote soon, but in the meantime, if you want to bang on it a little: >> http://people.apache.org/~tvolkert/dist/pivot/v1.4-rc1/ >> >> -T >> >> On Sat, Dec 19, 2009 at 10:52 AM, Greg Brown <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Hi all, >>> >>> We're getting ready to tag the 1.4 release - if you have time, please >>> review the current build and let us know if you see any issues. Otherwise, >>> we'll plan to tag on Tuesday or Wednesday and put the release to a vote. >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Greg >>> >>> > > -- Become a Wicket expert, learn from the best: http://wicketinaction.com Apache Wicket 1.4 increases type safety for web applications Get it now: http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.cgi/wicket/1.4.4
