Assuming that there are no issues with it, this set of artifacts is ultimately going to be released to the public as Pivot 1.4. So I believe we will need to call for an official vote (correct me if I am wrong).
Thanks, Greg On Dec 20, 2009, at 11:09 AM, Martijn Dashorst wrote: > Just a quick note: as long as you don't release to the general public > (i.e. users@) you don't have to formally vote on artifacts. This only > holds for things that are kept on dev@ or the occasional users seeing > if a bug has been fixed. > > Martijn > > On Sun, Dec 20, 2009 at 3:23 PM, Greg Brown <[email protected]> wrote: >> Why don't we just call for a vote? That way we don't have to go through the >> vetting process twice. >> >> I actually already did a full review of the artifacts and am ready to vote >> +1 when the vote is called. >> >> >> On Dec 20, 2009, at 3:44 AM, Todd Volkert wrote: >> >>> Tags are cheap, so I actually went ahead and created the RC1 tag. I'll call >>> for a vote soon, but in the meantime, if you want to bang on it a little: >>> http://people.apache.org/~tvolkert/dist/pivot/v1.4-rc1/ >>> >>> -T >>> >>> On Sat, Dec 19, 2009 at 10:52 AM, Greg Brown <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> Hi all, >>>> >>>> We're getting ready to tag the 1.4 release - if you have time, please >>>> review the current build and let us know if you see any issues. Otherwise, >>>> we'll plan to tag on Tuesday or Wednesday and put the release to a vote. >>>> >>>> Thanks, >>>> Greg >>>> >>>> >> >> > > > > -- > Become a Wicket expert, learn from the best: http://wicketinaction.com > Apache Wicket 1.4 increases type safety for web applications > Get it now: http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.cgi/wicket/1.4.4
