I'll admit that I've never used it, and only looked into it briefly,
but to me Cajo seemed like overkill for most web communication
scenarios. It seems better suited for grid computing.
But that's just my (again, mostly uninformed) 2 cents.
On Aug 21, 2009, at 8:29 AM, Vicente de Rivera III wrote:
Cajo is Awesomely Cool!
But just a newb question, how come this is not used (or less
popular) over the popular client-server communication solutions like
those Mr.Sandro mentioned? Is there any catch in it that would make
using Web Services safer (or something like that)?
On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 6:48 PM, Sandro Martini <[email protected]
> wrote:
Hi to all,
I'm doing a simple poll of how Pivot users have or are using a
messaging system to query data from servers.
Are Pivot Web Queries enough ?
For the 1.4 release if all is good, we should have also Digest
Authentication available, but maybe others (standards) could be
required.
Someone uses or has tried some others, like Hessian, Burlap, Spring
Remoting, or EJB or JMS, or direct RMI ?
Or some Web Services framework ... there are many.
Or in-house solutions like xml / json data generated by custom web
toolkits (Struts, Spring MVC, Tapestry, Wicket, etc) ...
I'm starting to use with Pivot a powerful library that uses RMI but in
a transparent way:
cajo ( https://cajo.dev.java.net/ ), someone knows it ?
Ideas / suggestions / improvements required ?
Bye,
Sandro
