On Tue, Sep 9, 2008 at 9:40 PM, Luca Capello <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thank you. If I could say more, I really prefer full dates (YYYYMMDD), > but this is not the scope of this bug report. That is too large and the shorter version can be directly used in sonames However, if my words above are correct, I can split ecl_1-1 into two > packages, libecl [2] and ecl [3], the latter depending on the former. This > means that if the standalone program I wrote works just with the shared > library, I don't need to install the other internal libraries and the > compiler. This is true. > Could this improve the situation? As I said, the problems are not on our side, so I presume this question goes to the bug originator :-) > I'd really like to have this bug fixed in lenny [4], but I don't > guarantee anything :-D > > > (*) Actually, given that people have also complained about my > > versioning scheme, I may just as well do that for real version > > numbers. > > Fully ACK, please do it! As mentioned in the previous email / bug answer, this change has been committed to ECL already. Juanjo -- Instituto de Física Fundamental CSIC, Serrano, 113, Madrid 28040 (Spain) http://juanjose.garciaripoll.googlepages.com
_______________________________________________ pkg-common-lisp-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-common-lisp-devel
