Hi Juanjo! Why didn't I wait for ten more minutes before sending my previous mail? I'd have seen you already fixed it, thank you!
On Tue, 09 Sep 2008 21:55:30 +0200, Juan Jose Garcia-Ripoll wrote: > On Tue, Sep 9, 2008 at 9:40 PM, Luca Capello <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Thank you. If I could say more, I really prefer full dates (YYYYMMDD), > but this is not the scope of this bug report. > > That is too large and the shorter version can be directly used in > sonames Good point. > However, if my words above are correct, I can split ecl_1-1 into two > packages, libecl [2] and ecl [3], the latter depending on the former. This > means that if the standalone program I wrote works just with the shared > library, I don't need to install the other internal libraries and the > compiler. > > This is true. > > Could this improve the situation? > > As I said, the problems are not on our side, so I presume this > question goes to the bug originator :-) Thus me, also one of the Debian maintainers, read below ;-) > As mentioned in the previous email / bug answer, this change has been > committed to ECL already. On Tue, 09 Sep 2008 21:38:13 +0200, Juan Jose Garcia-Ripoll wrote: > Last change in CVS ( 2008/09/09 ) > > - We switch to an Ubuntu-like versioning system, based on $(year).$(month).x > where "x" is 0 for a release or any higher number for a patched version. I'll play the Devil's advocate here, sorry: does this mean that 0.1.0 will be SONAME-compatible with 0.1.1? > - In Unix-type systems, ECL now installs with a "soname" and using versioned > directory names, such as /usr/lib/ecl-8.9.0, /usr/lib/libecl.so.8.9, etc Is a new release planned soon or should I package today's CVS snapshot to close this bug? This change not only fixes this problem, but it also lets different ECL versions be installed simultaneously. CLISP provides a similar situation, but we (i.e. Debian) decided to ship only one version. What's your advice here? I'd prefer keeping the situation as it is and consistent with CLISP: Debian ships one version, whenever it's possible the latest release. > This should be more than enough. Again, thank you not only for the fix, but mainly for the time you spent discussing it, I really appreciate. Thx, bye, Gismo / Luca
pgpAqSPpC5Kqu.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ pkg-common-lisp-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-common-lisp-devel
