Philip Brown wrote:
> 
> To make the solaris experience as pleasant as the linux experience, the 
> extra automated handholding, must be done by "the packager".
> As such, it seems to me to make the most sense, to give "the packager" the 
> maximum amount of flexibility and power, in "the packaging tools and 
> framework".
> 
> Ironically, i seem to recall that, just a few months ago, someone on this 
> very list was complaining about "the evils of layering", and how tight 
> integration was far preferable (the ZFS architecture example). Seems to me, 
> that attitude would mandate  "tight integration" of things that packagers 
> need to do, into "the packaging system".

Pious programming platitudes aside, how does your intrepid developer
handle the diskless client case? How does pkgadd -R work if the
post-install script needs more than a Solaris 8 compatible version
of awk?


- Bart

-- 
Bart Smaalders                  Solaris Kernel Performance
[EMAIL PROTECTED]               http://blogs.sun.com/barts
"You will contribute more with mercurial than with thunderbird".
_______________________________________________
pkg-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-discuss

Reply via email to