Richard Lowe wrote:
> Trevor Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> 
>> Stephen Hahn wrote:
>>> * Shawn Walker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-02-24 22:53]:
>>>> As a result of the above process, do you tend to keep a working copy
>>>> for each set of changes you are doing?
>>>   I do--a separate child for each.  Danek uses Mercurial Queues (mq)
>>>   sometimes, so he might have comments on how he handles multiple sets
>>>   of changes.
>> For what it's worth, I do the same as Stephen - I can understand that
>> model well as I have to do it for CVS repo's I use with other
>> projects.
>>

Me too - I find mercurial+cadmium a pretty easy transition from teamware.
W/ hg clone being as fast as it is, I find keeping separate working 
environments
to be simple and it's easier to remember what I was doing in each env.

- Bart


-- 
Bart Smaalders                  Solaris Kernel Performance
[EMAIL PROTECTED]               http://blogs.sun.com/barts
"You will contribute more with mercurial than with thunderbird."
_______________________________________________
pkg-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-discuss

Reply via email to