Danek Duvall wrote: > http://cr.opensolaris.org/~dduvall/pkg-misc3/ > > This is intended to fix > > 669 Need method to print package licenses before installation > 1144 "pkg list -as" fails when unable to write to the pkg directory > > and ends up fixing part of > > 208 pkg info, pkg list display no output for pkgs in the repository and > not i
> > Thanks, > Danek > _______________________________________________ > pkg-discuss mailing list > [email protected] > http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-discuss Can you add a test case for the new commands/options? Looks good. > I'd like folks' thoughts on the loop I copied from image.py to client.py. > That should be refactored, but given that it's slightly different in the > two places, I'm not sure what the best way is. I've got some ideas, but > they may be a bit too crazy. > Also, right now "pkg info <pkgname>" where <pkgname> is in the catalog, but > not installed on the system returns nothing at all. If you specify -r, it > pulls the info from the repo, and if you specify a package name which > doesn't exist in the catalog, it'll tell you to relax. Ideas on what the > behavior should be here? Perhaps a message like > > No package matching <blah> is installed on the system. > Suggest specifying -r to retrieve information from the server. > That sounds reasonable.... it could read No package matching <blah> is installed on the system; however, <blah expanded> is available in <...> repository. Specify -r to retrieve requested information from repository. - Bart -- Bart Smaalders Solaris Kernel Performance [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://blogs.sun.com/barts "You will contribute more with mercurial than with thunderbird." _______________________________________________ pkg-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-discuss
