On Fri 18 Apr 2008 at 03:12PM, Danek Duvall wrote:
> > I didn't think we had a state called "Not Installed"? Stephen had
> > some very precise opinions about this, see bug #1168.
>
> Not about this particular state. I think "Not installed" is about as
> user-friendly as it can be. I could say "Known", or "In catalog" as
> pkg-states.txt might dictate, but I think that either of those would be
> confusing to most people.
In my mind that just brings us back around to my original idea that
Stephen objected to, to say to the user:
Installed: Yes
Or
Installed: No
And then have other additional state information (broken, damaged, etc.)
on another line. :-/
-dp
--
Daniel Price - Solaris Kernel Engineering - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - blogs.sun.com/dp
_______________________________________________
pkg-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-discuss
