On 26 Jun 2008, at 21:09, Danek Duvall wrote: > On Thu, Jun 26, 2008 at 09:03:08PM +0100, Chris Ridd wrote: > >> $ pkgsend -s http://localhost:10000/ open [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> $ pkgsend -s http://localhost:10000/ include manifest >> $ pkgsend -s http://localhost:10000/ close >> PUBLISHED >> pkg:/[EMAIL PROTECTED],5.11:20080626T205448Z >> >> Note the version reported back is 1.1, not 1.01. The repo reports the >> version is 1.1 as well. >> >> Where's my leading zero gone? > > Each number between the dots (new fortune cookie reading?) is > treated as an > integer, so leading zeros are dropped.
That seems like it might be a bit too simplistic, but maybe having a leading zero inside a version string is asking for trouble anyway. > Is there a 1.1 version that's different from 1.01? Not yet, nor is there a 1.10 yet. > We've talked about having a "human readable" version that can be an > attribute on a package, which would allow for letters and other fun > things > in a displayed version, but you'd only see that in "pkg info", and > not in > any fmri display. It is also quite important to be able to compare the versions of two packages for ordering purposes. Cheers, Chris _______________________________________________ pkg-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-discuss
