Danek Duvall wrote: >> I understand the approach you're taking, but reasonable people might use a >> more mathematical approach. > > Show me.
http://www.usb.org/developers/devclass_docs/USB_Video_Class_Compliance_1.09b.pdf.zip is a draft version of v1.1 of that document. (Unfortunately, it looks like all of the other v1.1 USB device class documents have either been approved or abandoned; I don't see any others in this state. However, I believe it was the usual notation when they were in active development.) I'm not saying it's a common notation, or even a particularly good one, but I think it's been done. All it means is that you need to be very clear about the semantics of version numbers, and be prepared to respond to the occasional confused user. _______________________________________________ pkg-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-discuss
