Hi, V čt, 03. 07. 2008 v 16:28, Shawn Walker píše: > 2008/7/3 Milan Jurik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > This thing I understand. But not sure if such type of deliverables > > should be part of main repository. As I said, binary-only repository > > brings: > > I don't think anyone has suggested that the entire repository be so, > but a mix of things. >
But nobody is trying to split it to two independent. I didn't see proposal which prefers (and supports) automated build from source code uploads. Maybe I missed it. > > a) security concerns > > A matter of trust which is always present regardless of whether the > source is available. > I was thinking that open source is part of truss in this community. Will the day come when we will learn from our mistakes? > > b) law concerns > > Which have already been addressed and are therefore not a primary concern. > Did I miss it? Where? > > and decrease possibility of community cooperation > > If done poorly. > Try to learn from examples, it helps. > > Are you sure that the infrastructure provider is not vunerable against > > patent lawsuits? > > Which can happen regardless of whether the source code is available. > Yes, but you are minimizing the impact. Part of point b) Best regards, Milan _______________________________________________ pkg-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-discuss
