* Dan Price <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-09-08 21:32]: > On Mon 08 Sep 2008 at 02:25PM, Dan Price wrote: > > > > So this is, in my mind, a bad package version: > > > > pkg:/[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > Because of the use of 01.01. > > > > What should we do about this? I was about to putback a change which > > correctly detects these bad versions-- but doing so will break all > > packaging clients. > > > > Thoughts? Urgh. > > I should clarify that the bad version numbers appear to be in > 'depend' actions... the actual version of SUNWmkcd is 1.1.38-0.96. > > Here are the ones I have found thus far: > > depend fmri=pkg:/[EMAIL PROTECTED] type=incorporate > depend fmri=pkg:/[EMAIL PROTECTED] type=incorporate > depend fmri=pkg:/[EMAIL PROTECTED] type=incorporate
Hmm. (This might be where tainting incoming FMRIs was supposed to help.) Is there any benefit to having a canonical/non-canonical path for constructing FMRIs, where the canonical path corrects the string output in all cases? Can I make a package that has an FMRI with a leading '0'? - Stephen -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://blogs.sun.com/sch/ _______________________________________________ pkg-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-discuss
