On Wed 24 Sep 2008 at 05:00PM, Brad Hall wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 24, 2008 at 03:27:49PM -0700, Danek Duvall wrote:
> > On Tue, Sep 23, 2008 at 03:36:51PM -0700, Brad Hall wrote:
> >
> > > http://cr.opensolaris.org/~bhall/bug-388-2/
I'm sorry to be late on comments about this RFE. As I was falling
asleep last night it occurred to me that we should probably take
a ZFS snapshot (via the BE stuff) if we decide that any fixing is
needed. This could be a boon if the fix goes wrong somehow, or if
the user wants to i.e. go back to the pre-fixed state.
The other thing that occurred to me was that fix might not work
properly for certain cases-- such as the libc case, where we mount
the processor specific libc over top of the real libc... there must
be code in 'verify' that copes with this somehow, but I'm not clear
where that code actually lives.
Just some thoughts.
-dp
--
Daniel Price - Solaris Kernel Engineering - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - blogs.sun.com/dp
_______________________________________________
pkg-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-discuss
