Danek Duvall wrote: > On Fri, Dec 12, 2008 at 04:01:18PM -0800, Rich Burridge wrote: > > >>> line 135: I don't understand why you're using tokens[1] now instead of >>> tokens[0] -- the pathname you're passing in is the same, isn't it? >>> >> Sorry, I didn't understand this one. tokens[1] is the build >> number part of the current pathname. The debug message is >> simply there to print it out. >> > > The change replaces all instances of "tokens[0]" with "tokens[1]". Why? I > couldn't find where "pathname" (from which "tokens" is derived) is passed > in differently in the new code than it was in the old code. >
Ah. It was just plain broken in the previous (checked in) version. _______________________________________________ pkg-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-discuss
