On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 01:23:23PM -0700, Brock Pytlik wrote:
> [email protected] wrote:
>> Brock,
>>
>> On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 08:31:35PM -0700, Brock Pytlik wrote:
>>   
>>> http://cr.opensolaris.org/~bpytlik/ips-10515-v1/
>>>
>>> 10515 search should support -o for output like pkg contents
>>> 10608 search should support -H option for output
>>>     
>>
>> Meta-comments from me this time.
>>
>> I'm concerned about our use of valid_special_attrs, and related lists.
>> In general, it would be nice if we could filter on package attributes as
>> actions add them, without having to write code to do so.
>>   
> I'm confused by your comment. If you want to output the mode of an file  
> action, you do -o mode, and everything works. The special attributes are  
> ones that do not have a one-to-one mapping with attributes of an action.

So what about pkg.size and pkg.csize?  These ought to be covered, since
they're existing attributes of an action; however, we have special
mappings for them here.

>> Since the search output and contents output are trying to behave
>> similarly, they should probably share code.  Perhaps I missed it, but I
>> didn't see any changes to the contents routine.
>>
>>   
> Actually, nearly all the change is commonizing code between search and  
> contents. The change for contents starts in display_contents_results  
> (line 1552). The code that used to be in that method has been refactored  
> and adjusted to be shared between contents and search. Does that help?  
> (To be more explicit, both search and contents share all the functions  
> defined between lines 1388 and
> 1550.)

Yes, thanks.  Sorry I missed that.

-j
_______________________________________________
pkg-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-discuss

Reply via email to