On Tue, Aug 25, 2009 at 05:10:43PM -0700, Brock Pytlik wrote: > Ok, so now the claim is "while we provide mechanisms to get around the > issues of poor packaging, they're not convenient enough"? That's a > substantially different issue than "we need --force or --no-deps". > > My argument against --force or --no-deps is fairly simple: they give you > the *illusion* of fixing your system in a supported way ...
Hah, yes. This reminds me of the old, "ZFS can't possibly be as robust as UFS, because it doesn't have fsck," argument. -j _______________________________________________ pkg-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-discuss
