Could this be related to the problems I am seeing with pkgsend today? It was working yesterday.

+ sudo ./pkgmogrify.py -O ../../../proto/set-publisher/group%2Fsystem%2Fsolaris-small-server/0.5.11%2C5.11-0.170%3A20110712T190109Z/manifest ../../../proto/set-publisher/group%2Fsystem%2Fsolaris-small-server/0.5.11%2C5.11-0.170%3A20110712T190109Z/manifest ./set-publisher.transforms + sudo ./pkg_publish ../../../proto/set-publisher/group%2Fsystem%2Fsolaris-small-server/0.5.11%2C5.11-0.170%3A20110712T190109Z file:///export/repos/nightly
pkg://solaris/group/system/[email protected],5.11-0.170:20110712T190459Z
PUBLISHED
+ sudo ./pkgmogrify.py -O ../../../proto/set-publisher/package%2Fpkg%2Fpackage-manager/0.5.11%2C5.11-0.170%3A20110712T190115Z/manifest ../../../proto/set-publisher/package%2Fpkg%2Fpackage-manager/0.5.11%2C5.11-0.170%3A20110712T190115Z/manifest ./set-publisher.transforms + sudo ./pkg_publish ../../../proto/set-publisher/package%2Fpkg%2Fpackage-manager/0.5.11%2C5.11-0.170%3A20110712T190115Z file:///export/repos/nightly
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/export/gates/nightly/gate/src/util/publish/../../../proto/root_i386/usr/bin/pkgsend", line 799, in <module>
    __ret = main_func()
File "/export/gates/nightly/gate/src/util/publish/../../../proto/root_i386/usr/bin/pkgsend", line 758, in main_func
    ret = trans_publish(repo_uri, pargs)
File "/export/gates/nightly/gate/src/util/publish/../../../proto/root_i386/usr/bin/pkgsend", line 403, in trans_publish
    basedirs=basedirs, bundles=bundles)[0]
TypeError: set_action_data() got an unexpected keyword argument 'bundles'


On 7/12/2011 11:13 AM, Shawn Walker wrote:
On 07/12/11 10:18, Alan Steinberg wrote:
I noticed that these fixes have no references to pkgsend in the various
utilities under src/util in the hg gate:

distro-import/publish_ips
distro-import/import_manifest_file
publish/pkg_publish

Is this on anyone's radar, or should I open up a new bug for these? Or

Right, those are largely considered legacy tools, so I didn't expend any effort updating them, and they should continue to work for now.

can we get rid of the pkg_publish script, since it is just a call to
pkgsend now and it simplified by 18048 below?

Since I don't use pkg_publish, I couldn't say.

But yes, I suspect it may be possible to eliminate it.

-Shawn
_______________________________________________
pkg-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-discuss
_______________________________________________
pkg-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-discuss

Reply via email to