Shawn Walker wrote: > I'd also like to suggest we have pkg.vendor to easily identify the > company that produced the package easily (e.g. set name=pkg.vendor > value=Oracle).
Eh, I'm not sold on that. > PACKAGE CHANGE SUMMARY > solaris > entire > Installed: FCS Build 2 (0.5.11-0.175.0.0.0.2.0) > Latest: SRU 2 Build 3 (0.5.11-0.175.0.2.0.3.0) > Proposed: SRU 1 Build 4 (0.5.11-0.175.0.1.0.4.0) > > > PACKAGE CHANGE SUMMARY > solaris > entire > Installed: FCS Build 2 (0.5.11-0.175.0.0.0.2.0) > Proposed (Latest): SRU 2 Build 3 (0.5.11-0.175.0.2.0.3.0) > > > ...can be simplified to (assuming only one publisher offers the package): > > > PACKAGE CHANGE SUMMARY > Oracle Solaris > Package: entire > Installed: FCS Build 2 > Latest: SRU 2 Build 3 > Proposed: SRU 1 Build 4 > > > PACKAGE CHANGE SUMMARY > Oracle Solaris > Package: entire > Installed: FCS Build 2 > Proposed (Latest): SRU 2 Build 3 I thought the point was to get rid of "entire" from the output, but it's still there. You seem to have replaced the publisher name "solaris" with the product name "Oracle Solaris". Am I misunderstanding the intent, or did you typo this? Danek _______________________________________________ pkg-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-discuss
