Shawn Walker wrote: > On 02/20/12 15:09, Danek Duvall wrote: > >Shawn Walker wrote: > > > >>I'd also like to suggest we have pkg.vendor to easily identify the > >>company that produced the package easily (e.g. set name=pkg.vendor > >>value=Oracle). > > > >Eh, I'm not sold on that. > > Alternative suggestions welcomed. Liane thought I should add this or an > equivalent as part of this proposal. > > It came up recently with appcert(1) where it would have been nice to be able > to reliably identify Oracle-provided packages based on metadata.
I'm with Chris here -- I think that while it might have some utility, it probably needs to be narrower in focus if use for appcert is the goal, and I don't see it being a required part of this proposal, so I think it should be removed and part of a plan to support appcert, or as a purely decorative attribute. > >You seem to have replaced the publisher name "solaris" with the product > >name "Oracle Solaris". Am I misunderstanding the intent, or did you > >typo this? > > No, that's the intended result. To make the product name the "headline" for > the particular change, and to make the specifics details of that. > > If you believe this to be misleading or confusing, please expound. I find it extremely confusing; I think this will have to be worked out in person. Danek _______________________________________________ pkg-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-discuss
