On 08/21/12 02:38 PM, Liane Praza wrote:
> On 8/20/12 11:06 PM, Shawn Walker wrote:
>> On 08/20/12 16:40, Liane Praza wrote:
>>> - Will this use a "human-friendly" attribute if set? Can we see the
>>> proposed output for that, if so?
>>
>> Yes, I just didn't have any packages when I was doing the run-through that
>> had
>> one.
>
> Yeah, should definitely open the RE bug so that this gets populated on
> entire.
> (And probably a bug per consolidation so that interim builds get marked for
> consolidations' incorporations as well, when possible.) I'll try to follow up
> on that separately (or: Oy! Alan! Sound like a good idea?). But if you could
> open the RE one, that'd be helpful.
So you're thinking that if someone has either removed entire or unlocked
consolidations from it, they should see these versions on every incorporation?
Something like:
Package: consolidation/X/X-incorporation
Installed: 0.5.11-0.175.1.0.0.23.0
Proposed (Latest): Update 1 Build 23.0
Package: consolidation/desktop/desktop-incorporation
Installed: 0.5.11-0.175.1.0.0.22.0
Proposed (Latest): Update 1 Build 22.0
Package: consolidation/osnet/osnet-incorporation
Installed: 0.5.11-0.175.1.0.0.24.9876
Proposed (Latest): Update 1 nightly 2012-08-23
Package: consolidation/userland/userland-incorporation
Installed: 0.5.11-0.175.1.0.0.24.5432
Proposed (Latest): Update 1 nightly 2012-08-20
Presumably, we should have consistent naming style between these and entire
where possible.
--
-Alan Coopersmith- [email protected]
Oracle Solaris Engineering - http://blogs.oracle.com/alanc
_______________________________________________
pkg-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-discuss
