2007/12/29, Michael Koch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > On Sat, Dec 29, 2007 at 11:35:54PM +0100, Marcus Better wrote: > > Dalibor Topic wrote: > > > I'm not sure if our ideas are really opposed: > > > > Certainly not, I'm all for doing rebuilds of reverse dependencies if > > possible. So do you have any plans on how to implement this? Should the > > rebuilding be done before uploading a new version, or will that take too > > long? Or should we just have an ongoing archive rebuild as a QA effort? > > I would vote for doing this before the upload to the archive. > > I have a buildd here configured to be able to rebuild all reverse > dependencies of a package on request. I'm happy to to do this for > everyone who asks. Unfortunately I cant put that machine available for > everyone. Its a 4 way machine with a daily updated sid-mirror on disk. > It can build amd64 and i386 currently. I work on being able to build for > other archs too.
This is excellent! ;-) Happy New Year! :-D -- Arnaud Vandyck _______________________________________________ pkg-java-maintainers mailing list pkg-java-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers