Hi. Gabriele Giacone ha scritto: > On 03/11/2010 11:30 PM, Torsten Werner wrote: >> after accepting the first FreeHEP package by accident I have found out that >> http://java.freehep.org/license.html mentions both LGPL-2.1 and LGPL-3. What >> is >> the correct license (version)? > > The correct version is LGPL-2.1 as d/copyright states. > This thread [1] gives more info about freehep packages licensing status > that is not changed during last months and upstream didn't fix the > mismatch on the freehep homepage yet. > Anyway, all of freehep-graphicsio-* packages are part of Freehep > Vectorgraphics and its license page [2] is correct.
As stated in [1], all the packages from vectorgraphics (of which freehep-graphicsio-pdf and other are part) are under a LGPL license. No version is explicitly chosen, so my understanding is that I can choose the version I want (see LGPL-3, sixth article). We decided to put LGPL-2-1+, as stated in debian/copyright. [1] http://java.freehep.org/svn/repos/freehep/show/freehep/trunk/vectorgraphics/LICENSE.txt I hope this is enough to clear the situation! :-) Thanks, Giovanni. -- Giovanni Mascellani <[email protected]> Pisa, Italy Web: http://poisson.phc.unipi.it/~mascellani Jabber: [email protected] / [email protected]
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ pkg-java-maintainers mailing list [email protected] http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers
