tags 758310 + pending thanks On Mon, 20 Apr 2015 13:20:09 -0400 James McCoy <james...@debian.org> wrote: > As Luca points out, this is due to NeoVim requiring a newer version of > libuv, so I'm going to change this bug accordingly to request updating > to the current stable upstream release.
libuv upstream decided to maintain two active branches alive at the same time. Given the soname bump (libuv0.10 -> libuv1), it is my understanding that neovim wants libuv1. libuv1 has just been uploaded to sid, but given the length of the NEW queue at this moment, it may take some time before hitting the archive: https://ftp-master.debian.org/new/libuv1_1.4.2-1.html If you want to start building/testing your neovim package, you can build yourself current libuv1 (1.4.2-1) from git: http://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/pkg-javascript/libuv1.git Cheers, Luca -- .''`. ** Debian GNU/Linux ** | Luca Bruno (kaeso) : :' : The Universal O.S. | lucab (AT) debian.org `. `'` | GPG Key ID: 0x4F3BBEBF `- http://www.debian.org | Debian GNU/Linux Developer
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list Pkg-javascript-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-javascript-devel
