On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 09:18:30PM +0200, Luca Bruno wrote: > On Mon, 20 Apr 2015 13:20:09 -0400 James McCoy <james...@debian.org> wrote: > > > As Luca points out, this is due to NeoVim requiring a newer version of > > libuv, so I'm going to change this bug accordingly to request updating > > to the current stable upstream release. > > libuv upstream decided to maintain two active branches alive at the same > time. > Given the soname bump (libuv0.10 -> libuv1), it is my understanding that > neovim wants libuv1.
Correct. > libuv1 has just been uploaded to sid, but given the length of the NEW queue > at > this moment, it may take some time before hitting the archive: > https://ftp-master.debian.org/new/libuv1_1.4.2-1.html Thanks! We still have plenty of other dependencies that need to packaged, so this shouldn't be an issue. Cheers, -- James GPG Key: 4096R/331BA3DB 2011-12-05 James McCoy <james...@debian.org>
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list Pkg-javascript-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-javascript-devel
