On Monday 28 December 2015 15:07:12 Dmitry Shachnev wrote: > Hi Steve, > > On Sun, Dec 27, 2015 at 12:08:45PM -0600, Steve M. Robbins wrote: > > DigiKam itself currently uses (Qt4-version) libqtwebkit-dev. I saw the > > bug > > about it and the web page https://wiki.debian.org/Qt4WebKitRemoval > > What I haven't seen is a precise time for this. The schedule for Digikam > > 5 > > release is May, so I (hopefully) won't need to care after that. Is the > > webkit going to be removed before next May? > > Actually I would like it to be removed before May. I am going to bump bugs > severities to important soon (in January) and make them RC a couple of > months after that (i.e. in March) to get the packages removed from testing > (or fixed). > > I am also going to remove the PyQt5 QtWebKit bindings very soon (in a couple > of weeks). > > So maybe it's not the best idea to introduce a new package using QtWebKit. > > Lisandro, you did not reply to this part of Steve's message, what do you > think?
We need a kf5-based kdepim in unstable first. I was told that current packages in experimental are not ready for unstable yet. -- When the winds of change are blowing, some people are building shelters, and others are building windmills. Old Chinese Proverb Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer http://perezmeyer.com.ar/ http://perezmeyer.blogspot.com/
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
-- http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-kde-talk
