Hi all, On Mon, Dec 21, 2015 at 11:38:41PM -0500, Scott Kitterman wrote: > Digikam is notoriously difficult to package before final release due to > depending on unreleased library versions and/or embedded code copies. Not > packaging pre-release versions of Digikam is an eminently reasonable thing > to do. This is particularly true right now when no one else was working on > it at all AFAICT. > > It's not entirely clear is we'll succeed in getting entirely rid of Qt4 this > cycle. The thing we know for sure is going away is QtWebKit for Qt4.
If nobody is developing a Qt 5.x version of Digikam, then maybe packaging the Qt 4.x version is OK. Otherwise I would rather not introduce any new Qt 4.x packages to Debian (especially provided that the official support for Qt 4 ended 3 days ago [1]). [1]: http://blog.qt.io/blog/2014/11/27/qt-4-8-x-support-to-be-extended-for-another-year/ -- Dmitry Shachnev
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
-- http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-kde-talk
