On Mo, Jan 25, 2010 at 10:53:59 (CET), Fabian Greffrath wrote: > Am 24.01.2010 20:43, schrieb Andres Mejia: >> Wouldn't it make more sense to continue with a version number >> "0.5+svn<DATE>"? >> Not that it really matters to me, I'm just curious as to why "0.6" already? >> Also, shouldn't the package be named ffmpeg-snapshot, ffmpeg-trunk, or >> something >> similar? > > +1
Why should we? This would only make sense if we would want to make these packages co-installable with the existing packages. I don't think this is worth the efford. > Has upstream already announced that they are going to release a 0.6 > version at all? If not, I also think it's unwise to select this specific > version number for our own packages in advance. No such release is planned, and this is exactly what I want to discuss at FOSDEM. >> I'll volunteer to help if you wish. I could do regular uploads of the package >> depending on what interval you wanted. Of course I'll leave the initial >> packaging setup up to you. > > Same here. I've become a bit less active recently, but if there's > something I can do to help and/or test, I'm of course there! Thanks. Just keep an eye on the 'master.snapshot' branch as soon as I push my commits there. I have the branch almost ready, however I want to clean it up a bit before public consumption -- Gruesse/greetings, Reinhard Tartler, KeyID 945348A4 _______________________________________________ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers