Am 25.01.2010 12:38, schrieb Reinhard Tartler:
Why should we? This would only make sense if we would want to make these packages co-installable with the existing packages. I don't think this is worth the efford.
This was misunderstanding, sorry, I placed my "+1" wrongly. I am not for renaming the source or binary packages names anyway! I just wanted to express my consent with not naming them "0.6+something" if upstream isn't even considering such a release at all.
No such release is planned, and this is exactly what I want to discuss at FOSDEM.
Well, fine then. ;) -- Dipl.-Phys. Fabian Greffrath Ruhr-Universität Bochum Lehrstuhl für Energieanlagen und Energieprozesstechnik (LEAT) Universitätsstr. 150, IB 3/134 D-44780 Bochum Telefon: +49 (0)234 / 32-26334 Fax: +49 (0)234 / 32-14227 E-Mail: greffr...@leat.ruhr-uni-bochum.de _______________________________________________ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers