On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 14:25:12 (CET), Adrian Knoth wrote: > On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 02:24:49AM +0100, David Henningsson wrote: > >> >> On the other hand, for casual use of jack, a more stable version would >> >> be preferred over a more featureful one. >> > Unfortunately, this is only half of the story. For the occasional use of >> > jack, jackd2 is easier to use, because it can suspend pulseaudio. >> >> Let me add a third half to the story then :-) Lennart (as in the >> PulseAudio developer) came up with an idea of reserving / letting go of >> audio devices via calls over D-Bus. This is not implemented in jack1. >> I haven't tested jackd2, but I believe it is implemented there. >> >> I don't think any of them actually *suspends* PulseAudio. > > This is what I was talking about. It's device reservation via D-Bus, and > it requires jackdbus from the jackd2 package to work.
>From this discussion, I gather the following options: A) stick with jack1 B) have jack2 in squeeze C) have both jack1&jack2 in squeeze F) further discussion With such an fictional ballot, I'd vote: A>B>F>C If you care to comment on this issue, please participate in the vote, so that we can assemble a report for the release team quickly. -- Gruesse/greetings, Reinhard Tartler, KeyID 945348A4 _______________________________________________ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
