Am 18.03.2010 15:35, schrieb Reinhard Tartler:
If you care to comment on this issue, please participate in the vote, so that we can assemble a report for the release team quickly.
I am indifferent between A and B, just because I am lacking knowledge about jack internals. But either of both is IMHO better than maintaining both packages, which will require a lot of new infrastructure and redundant work and further discussion only slows things down even more. So my vote is:
(A<>B)>C>F My vote should not be decisive for the choice between jack1 and jack2. -- Dipl.-Phys. Fabian Greffrath Ruhr-Universität Bochum Lehrstuhl für Energieanlagen und Energieprozesstechnik (LEAT) Universitätsstr. 150, IB 3/134 D-44780 Bochum Telefon: +49 (0)234 / 32-26334 Fax: +49 (0)234 / 32-14227 E-Mail: greffr...@leat.ruhr-uni-bochum.de _______________________________________________ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
