On 9 May 2015 at 11:03, Andreas Cadhalpun <andreas.cadhal...@googlemail.com> wrote: > Hi Felipe, > > On 09.05.2015 15:55, Felipe Sateler wrote: >> On 9 May 2015 at 10:36, Andreas Cadhalpun >> <andreas.cadhal...@googlemail.com> wrote: >>> It seemed like a clear consensus, since no further discussion happened. >> >> I think there cannot possibly be either consensus or disagreement >> since only the "DMM cabal" is involved in this discussion. I have so >> far refrained from getting involved here because I have no particular >> insight to offer either way. But I think this "poll" is meaningless >> without asking all (or at least a large portion) of the rdeps >> maintainers. >> >> % grep-dctrl -e -sMaintainer -n -FBuild-Depends \ >> 'libav(device|codec|filter|format|resample|util|swscale)' \ >> >> /var/lib/apt/lists/cloudfront.debian.net_debian_dists_sid_main_source_Sources >> \ >> | sort -u | wc -l >> 53 > > This is why I CC'ed the maintainers of all reverse (build-)dependencies > on my mail with the transition plan. > Unfortunately it didn't make it to the list, so I had to resent it.
Hmm, I seem to have missed that. But in any case my point stands. *IF* things are to be decided by poll[1], then at least all stakeholders should participate. Did you get any responses as to whether maintainers were happy or concerned about switching the libav* providers? If not, maybe it's worth another round explicitly asking? [1] I'm not sure this is the best idea but it's not the worst either. -- Saludos, Felipe Sateler _______________________________________________ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers