also sprach Michael Biebl <[email protected]> [2014-10-07 14:36 +0200]: > No, it's a misunderstanding. You would have to opt-in for the > warning message to go away. systemd-networkd expects the new > naming policy to be active (because that's the upstream default). > If it's not, it assumes you have disabled it via the kernel > command line.
So systemd-networkd is a requirement now and gets enabled on all systems that run systemd? And the warning is there to remind the admin that s/he has to make changes now to accomodate the new, uninvited guest? What's the rationale here? -- .''`. martin f. krafft <[email protected]> @martinkrafft : :' : proud Debian developer `. `'` http://people.debian.org/~madduck `- Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing systems "you raise the blade, you make the change you rearrange me till i'm sane. you lock the door, and throw away the key, there's someone in my head but it's not me." -- pink floyd, 1972
digital_signature_gpg.asc
Description: Digital signature (see http://martin-krafft.net/gpg/sig-policy/999bbcc4/current)
_______________________________________________ Pkg-systemd-maintainers mailing list [email protected] http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-systemd-maintainers
