"David Smith" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Michael Olson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> Jim Ottaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> >>> There is a case for having it as a separate project, since it is >>> useful outside of planner, and adding it to the planner project would >>> reinforce the confusion about whether it is or is not part of >>> planner. >>> >>> I seem to remember that org-mode can use remember too, but I don't >>> know if it is widely used in that context. And, of course, it can be >>> used to great effect on its own. >> >> Hmm, I guess having it be its own project would be good >> future-proofing. I think it might be best to go with that. >> >> Does anyone have further comments on the issue? > > It doesn't seem like there is any down-side to breaking it off > into its own package. I agree with separating it out.
I've now begun the process of registering a remember-el project with GNA. -- Michael Olson -- FSF Associate Member #652 -- http://www.mwolson.org/ Interests: Emacs Lisp, text markup, protocols -- Jabber: mwolson_at_hcoop.net /` |\ | | | IRC: freenode.net/mwolson: #emacs, #hcoop, #muse, #PurdueLUG |_] | \| |_| Projects: Emacs, Muse, ERC, EMMS, Planner, ErBot, DVC
pgpdTgLJmjXOr.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Planner-el-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/planner-el-discuss
