"John Sullivan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I'm still not seeing it. You are not throwing the data at Emacs if you > are trying to stop in mid-air / mid-thought and start something new. I > still think the first buffer should be resolved before the second one is > started. If you are returning to a Remember buffer that you've already > started, then I would call that editing.
Yes, I can see what you mean. I suppose the question is whether serial note-taking is intrinsic to remember such that allowing multiple buffers would introduce some confusion over what it was for. I would certainly respect that view. > Maybe an alternative idea is to make one binding that resolves the > current Remember buffer and immediately opens a new one? That sound like a good idea. Regards, -- Jim Ottaway _______________________________________________ Planner-el-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/planner-el-discuss
