>>>>> Markus Hoenicka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Hi, > I can only second Tim's comments here. I'm also silently using > planner-mode every day at work, and it became an indispensable tool to > get my research organized.
And I would like to second Markus's comments. For me, the single most important aspect of planner is that it is part of the muse system. This has enabled me to organize not only "plans", but also sets of notes from empirical research, from historical documents and from theoretical sources, as well as annotated bookmarks of web resources, and lecture notes and slides in a very flexible and reusable way that doesn't appear so readily achievable using org-mode's hierarchical outline structure and its notes-and-tasks-together design. Others may find org-mode suits them better, which is fine of course, but it doesn't suit me to have plans and notes in the same file since I will use the same collection of notes and documents for many different purposes. Having said that, I'm sure there are all sorts of interesting things that org-mode can do that could be ported to muse/planner. Another thought that I have had more than once is that it might be interesting to implement something similar to org-mode using muse, so that one could use the org-mode style of planning but integrated into the muse system. It should also be noted that because planner is "in" muse, as it were, a lot of its development is actually development of muse, which is not represented here in the planner mail list. Regards, -- Jim Ottaway _______________________________________________ Planner-el-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/planner-el-discuss
