2009/9/14 Sebastian Kügler <se...@kde.org> > On Monday 14 September 2009 14:21:38 Alessandro Diaferia wrote: > > I can propose a draft. I think I'll discuss about it today live together > > with Francesco.. I'll post the draft here as soon as i get something > > convincing :) > > Cool, looking forward to seeing it. > > Keep in mind that we'll want to do the same for other content sources as > well. In the > end, we might write applets for a "type of dataengine" and make the > dataengine > implementation that is used configurable. That way, we get content provider > plugins > for specific services. > > And we could even write tests for it :D > -- > sebas > > http://www.kde.org | http://vizZzion.org | GPG Key ID: 9119 0EF9 > > _______________________________________________ > Plasma-devel mailing list > Plasma-devel@kde.org > https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/plasma-devel > > That's great! Do we want to keep the "API" on the DataEngine's query side or do we want to provide a set of inherited DataEngines such as for example Plasma::MediaContentsDataEngine ? But probably that's too much.
-- Alessandro Diaferia KDE Developer
_______________________________________________ Plasma-devel mailing list Plasma-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/plasma-devel
