2009/9/14 Sebastian Kügler <se...@kde.org> > On Monday 14 September 2009 15:06:35 Alessandro Diaferia wrote: > > That's great! Do we want to keep the "API" on the DataEngine's query side > > or do we want to provide a set of inherited DataEngines such as for > > example Plasma::MediaContentsDataEngine ? But probably that's too much. > > On the one hand, it would make sense to share some common code, on the > other hand, > having an abstract mediacontent engine might not be what we want (since > DataEngine is > already abstract enough and should work fine). I suspect that this is > something we'll > find out as we have code for more than one or two engines. That should give > us a > better feeling for how much abstraction makes sense here. >
+1 :) > > Cheers, > -- > sebas > > http://www.kde.org | http://vizZzion.org | GPG Key ID: 9119 0EF9 > > _______________________________________________ > Plasma-devel mailing list > Plasma-devel@kde.org > https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/plasma-devel > > -- Alessandro Diaferia KDE Developer
_______________________________________________ Plasma-devel mailing list Plasma-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/plasma-devel
