On September 23, 2009, Aurélien Gâteau wrote: > Aaron J. Seigo a écrit : > > On September 23, 2009, Marco Martin wrote: > >> every other consideration aside, i feel that it would have been -far- > >> easier to mantain if the systray patch just consisted in notifications > >> disabling and provide a totally separate daemon for that kind of > >> notifications > > > > unless i'm misremembering things, this is also what i suggested to the > > people working on this when the Ayatana notifications design was first > > announced. > > My first implementation was doing exactly this. But I was told (by a > Plasma dev) it was not a good idea.
what i'm pretty sure i said (could be wrong, was a # of months ago) was that the option in the system tray could be defaulted very easily to "off" and the new style of notifications could run separate from it. it could make sense to share the notifications DataEngine, depending on how that part was written, but modifications to the systray widget should not have been necessary. i pointed out (i think to Bo?) that the systray was designed to easily "get out of the way" of notifications and that one could watch for the notifications host dbus service becoming available. -- Aaron J. Seigo humru othro a kohnu se GPG Fingerprint: 8B8B 2209 0C6F 7C47 B1EA EE75 D6B7 2EB1 A7F1 DB43 KDE core developer sponsored by Qt Development Frameworks
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ Plasma-devel mailing list Plasma-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/plasma-devel