> > IMHO distributions using Plasma LTS, Plasma team & other stakeholders should > > team up here and maintain a matching LTS branch of Frameworks together at > > the > > central KDE repos together. Well, and a version also satisfying other > > clients > > of KF, like non-workspace applications from KDE. > >
Just to clarify something. "the Plasma team" is not unified in the position that there should be any changes to the current framework's release cycle. > So perhaps we could say that the KF version which happens to be the dependency for a Plasma LTS release could have bugfix releases? Note that next Plasma LTS is a different case anyway as KF6 will be well into development and KF5 branches will be somewhat frozen. The exact details of which is another discussion. David
