kmaterka added a comment.

  In D29386#662960 <https://phabricator.kde.org/D29386#662960>, @ngraham wrote:
  
  > Great catch. The logic seems sane to me. Note that if you plan to land this 
on the stable branch, there will be merge conflicts that you'll need to resolve 
carefully, since it looks like this code has changed a bit between 5.18 and 
5.19.
  
  
  I know, because I changed it :) In 5.19 entire data model was rewritten, so 
that this change might not be need or better approach can be used. I will check 
it.

REPOSITORY
  R120 Plasma Workspace

BRANCH
  Plasma/5.18

REVISION DETAIL
  https://phabricator.kde.org/D29386

To: kmaterka, #plasma_workspaces, #plasma, davidedmundson, broulik, ngraham
Cc: plasma-devel, Orage, LeGast00n, The-Feren-OS-Dev, cblack, jraleigh, zachus, 
fbampaloukas, ragreen, ZrenBot, ngraham, himcesjf, lesliezhai, ali-mohamed, 
jensreuterberg, abetts, sebas, apol, ahiemstra, mart

Reply via email to